"It's time that Remainers put the national interest first and rally behind Brexit"
"It’s decision time: do you stand with Britain or the EU?"
Do you support Lilliput or Blefuscu in their egg
wars?
When are you going to stop beating your wife?
############
I work in international IT standards for
a German, French, Finnish, UK firm headquartered in Sweden. I am currently
working on a pan-European defence data harmonization project. My wife is an EU
citizen (German). I travel quite often and most of income from the UK’s branch of
the company I work for comes from abroad – especially, but not exclusively, from
other EU countries.
Post Brexit my working and personal life
will become more complicated (I’ve already spent 100s of man-hours battling
with the Home Office just to get a residency permit for my wife) and less
lucrative. My firm, its employees, and I will probably make less money and pay
less tax and we’ll spend more time on red tape. But we’ll survive, or move
abroad. The people who are really going to be hit badly are less well paid and unskilled
in places like Sunderland – ie the people who voted for Brexit.
I’ve yet to hear of a single concrete
advantage that Brexit will bring.
So what are Tim Stanley’s arguments?
Exhibit A: those who say Britain has a big bill coming
This is a total non-issue. When in the EU we made various financial
commitments – like Nigel Farage’s pension and the European Medicines Agency’s
rent for the next 20 years (this in London but they’re now moving to Paris to
pay rent there cos we’re leaving that too). We and the 27 will obviously argue
about the amounts and presumably reach a compromise which a majority of the 27
will have to agree to. We’ll have to do this before we can start talking about
trade. The amounts are significant but small beer in terms of our long term
trading activities.
Exhibit B: those who
believe everything the EU says
Tim writes:
"We are threatening to walk away with no deal in the hope that, in order to persuade us otherwise, the other side will offer us the best deal. This position is framed to serve the national interest. More journalists should honestly explain it."
This is just nonsense.
We can’t get a good deal. This is
nothing to do with Juncker. May has ruled out a good deal. She has said she
wants to end free-movement and leave the Single Market and the Customs Union. These
three decisions will hurt the UK badly. The only thing left to deal over is therefore
a Canada-style Free (ie low or no tariff) Trade Agreement. Both the UK and the EU
will benefit (a bit) from this so it will probably happen – though it will take
several years and require the unanimous agreement of the 27, so it won’t be
easy. If we walk away, it is simply the FTA we shall be walking away from. We’ve
already walked away from the really good stuff. In short the conversation between
May and the EU has been a bit like this so far:
May: “Give me what I want or I’ll shoot myself!”
EU: “What do you want?”
May: “I want to shoot myself.”
EU: “If you do that, at best, it will hurt a lot and, at worst, it will be fatal.”
May: “The EU are threatening to kill me!”
Given May's stance, walking away or staying in the negotiations will
yield almost exactly the same
outcome: loss of the advantages of Free Movement, the Single Market, and the Customs
Union and, in their place, some kind of free trade agreement. (We’ll come back eventually
and make an FTA even if we initially walk off in a huff cos it would be bonkers
all-round not to. But an FTA will be small recompense for the trade we shall
lose through our other decisions.)
Exhibit C: those who yearn for failure
We don’t yearn for failure we simply point
out that failure is almost inevitable.
We shall (one day) get an FTA with the
EU and (possibly) with some other countries. These new FTAs may be better than
what the EU has managed to negotiate with those third countries (though this
seems hard to imagine given the much bigger clout of the EU). But even if all
this goes swimmingly, the resulting increases in trade are vanishing unlikely
to compensate for the losses of our existing trade with the EU.
International cooperation, product standardization,
regulatory harmonization, travel, migration, and trade all benefit the world in
general and the UK in particular. The efforts of people like Tim Stanley and 52%
of the British public (in their current mood) will put a brake on all these activities
for a while – to the detriment of the UK, its international standing, and its
economy. In the long run, however, the UK will come to its senses and stop
trying to think it can have capitalism in one country.
So I stand with Britain and the EU.
Britain is much better off as part of
the Single Market and Custom Union and will suffer when it leaves and takes
away our freedom to live and work across 28 countries. I am afraid I am going
to carry on saying this and fighting against isolationism and xenophobia as
long as I draw breath; and if Tim Stanley thinks this unpatriotic, tough!
The
real traitors are the politicians who told bare-face lies in order to get the
vote they wanted. It is they who are irreparably damaging our country not
people like me.
Well said!
ReplyDeleteWell said!
ReplyDeleteCompletely agree. What on earth has happened to reason on the Leave side?
ReplyDeleteThis is nonsense. Britain's best interest's, by far, are served by remaining in the EU. The true patriots are those who can see past the end of their noses.
ReplyDeletenicely summarised - that article has been bugging me so much - not that I'm into allegations of treachery - but it's brexiters who act in the worst interests of the country - not us!
ReplyDeleteThank you Michael, excellent post. I, too, will continue to fight against brexit and, if we do leave the EU (I still hope sense prevails), I will continue to fight for us to re-join.
ReplyDelete